← Atlas

Operators · Quantum metrology states

NOON state (two-mode, N=2)

The NOON state (|N,0⟩+|0,N⟩)/√2: a two-mode entangled state with all N particles in one mode or the other, the standard resource for Heisenberg-limited interferometric phase estimation.

Exact & formalUpdated

View frozen graph

NOON qubit (|N,0⟩/|0,N⟩)Step 1 of 2 · H · on NOON qubit (|N,0⟩/|0,N⟩)HStep 2 of 2 · RZ(Nφ) · on NOON qubit (|N,0⟩/|0,N⟩)RZ(Nφ)

2 steps across 1 wire. Hover a step, or press play to go through them in order.

Expected outcomes

  • |N,0⟩ (before phase)50%
  • |0,N⟩ (before phase)50%
  • Steps2
  • Wires1
  • Modes2 (a, b)
  • Particle numberN (N=2 shown)
  • Phase scalinge^{iNφ} (Heisenberg limit Δφ=1/N)
  • Papers1

The N00N state on two bosonic modes a,ba,b with NN total particles is

∣NOON⟩=∣N⟩a∣0⟩b+∣0⟩a∣N⟩b2,|\mathrm{NOON}\rangle = \frac{|N\rangle_a|0\rangle_b + |0\rangle_a|N\rangle_b}{\sqrt2},

an equal superposition of "all NN particles in mode aa" and "all NN particles in mode bb." Because this superposition lives entirely within the two-dimensional subspace spanned by {∣N,0⟩,∣0,N⟩}\{|N,0\rangle,|0,N\rangle\}, it can be tracked with a single effective qubit for circuit-level bookkeeping: ∣0⟩eff≡∣N,0⟩|0\rangle_{\text{eff}}\equiv|N,0\rangle, ∣1⟩eff≡∣0,N⟩|1\rangle_{\text{eff}}\equiv|0,N\rangle, giving ∣NOON⟩≅∣+⟩eff=H∣0⟩eff|\mathrm{NOON}\rangle \cong |+\rangle_{\text{eff}} = H|0\rangle_{\text{eff}}, formally identical to the Hadamard-basis state elsewhere in this catalog. This embedding is exact for tracking amplitudes and relative phase within the N00N manifold, but it does not capture the full bosonic Fock space or the nonlinear-optical resources (or heralded multi-photon interference) actually required to generate ∣N,0⟩+∣0,N⟩|N,0\rangle+|0,N\rangle physically for N>2N>2; the N=2N=2 case alone is producible with linear optics via Hong–Ou–Mandel-style two-photon bunching at a 50:50 beamsplitter fed with one photon per input port.

Phase sensitivity. Passing mode aa through a phase shift ϕ\phi (relative to bb) evolves the state to

∣NOON(ϕ)⟩=eiNϕ∣N,0⟩+∣0,N⟩2,|\mathrm{NOON}(\phi)\rangle = \frac{e^{iN\phi}|N,0\rangle + |0,N\rangle}{\sqrt2},

since each of the NN particles picks up phase ϕ\phi independently, giving NϕN\phi total — an NN-fold compression of the interference fringe compared to a single-particle probe, where the fringe would oscillate as cos⁡ϕ\cos\phi rather than cos⁡(Nϕ)\cos(N\phi). Standard phase-estimation error propagation gives Δϕ=1/N\Delta\phi = 1/N for an ideal N00N-state measurement (the Heisenberg limit), compared to Δϕ=1/N\Delta\phi = 1/\sqrt N for NN independent uncorrelated probes at the same total resource count (the standard quantum limit) — the quadratic advantage in NN that motivates using entangled probe states for quantum-enhanced sensing.

Fragility. The metrological advantage is purchased at a steep cost in robustness: losing even a single one of the NN particles collapses the coherence between the ∣N,0⟩|N,0\rangle and ∣0,N⟩|0,N\rangle branches entirely (an environment that "sees" which branch the lost particle came from performs a which-path measurement), so N00N-state sensitivity degrades catastrophically under loss, unlike less fragile metrological resource states such as spin-squeezed or Dicke states. This tradeoff between Heisenberg-limited scaling and loss-sensitivity is the central practical constraint on N00N-state interferometry.

Where this shows up. N00N states are the textbook example motivating quantum-enhanced interferometry and quantum radar/lidar proposals, and the N=2N=2 case connects directly to two-photon Hong–Ou–Mandel interference — the same bosonic bunching effect that underlies photonic SWAP-test and boson-sampling architectures.

References

  • A Quantum Rosetta Stone for Interferometry

    Hwang Lee, Pieter Kok, Jonathan P. Dowling · 2002

    Introduces and reviews the N00N-state formalism connecting quantum optical interferometry to quantum-information notation, including the Heisenberg-limited phase-scaling result used here.

Exact & formal
  • Direct mathematics
  • Verified by construction
  • Peer-reviewed paper
Method
The state's amplitudes in the two-dimensional {|N,0⟩,|0,N⟩} subspace were compared exactly against the definition (1/√2, 1/√2), and the N-fold phase-accumulation factor e^{iNφ} was checked by direct substitution into the interferometric phase-evolution formula for a general N00N state.
Result
Pass · the embedded qubit reproduces the exact (1/√2,1/√2) amplitude split, and applying a phase φ to one mode yields the analytic e^{iNφ} scaling, reproducing the N-fold interference-fringe compression used for Heisenberg-limited metrology.
Caveat
The single-qubit embedding exactly tracks amplitudes and relative phase within the {|N,0⟩,|0,N⟩} manifold, but does not model the full bosonic Fock space, mode loss, or the nonlinear/heralded photonic resources actually needed to generate N00N states with N>2.
A Quantum Rosetta Stone for Interferometry ↗
Kind
curated reference
Reviewed by
Leona Quantum curation pass
License
CC BY 4.0-compatible reference metadata
noon statequantum metrologyheisenberg limitinterferometryphotonic

Atlas stars stay in the public catalog. Saving this entry to your workspace starts an unstarred private copy.