Every record is classified by how it was verified. The badge shows the strongest tier of evidence; the chips list each method that applies.
≡Exact & formal
The defining behavior was checked exactly: a mathematical identity, a full statevector or stabilizer simulation, or an exhaustive basis-state truth table.
Direct mathematics
An analytic identity or closed-form derivation proves the defining property (e.g. H² = I, Y = iXZ).
Unitary / matrix equivalence
The circuit's unitary was computed and compared against the reference matrix.
Exact statevector simulation
A full statevector simulation reproduced the exact expected state or distribution.
Reversible classical logic was checked exhaustively (or at edge cases) on computational-basis inputs.
✓Strong empirical
The design was verified by construction plus measured evidence: statistical re-execution, small-instance analytic agreement, sub-block, echo, or invariant checks. Scale-specific bugs can still survive.
Statistical re-execution
Measured counts from independent executions agreed within statistical tolerance (e.g. TVD bounds).
Small-instance agreement
The same generator matched analytic results at tractable sizes; large instances are inferred.
The circuit follows a specification whose correctness argument is standard; the construction was audited against it.
◐Attested & literature
The record rests on external authority: peer-reviewed papers, standard textbooks, expert review, or evidence carried over from related verified entries. Nothing here was re-executed by this catalog.
Peer-reviewed paper
The record's claims trace to one or more peer-reviewed publications cited on the entry.
Textbook / standard citation
The behavior is standard material (e.g. Nielsen & Chuang, OpenQASM spec) and is cross-referenced, not re-derived.
Expert review
A named human reviewer with domain expertise checked the record.
Tangential evidence
Correctness is supported indirectly through related verified entries (e.g. a gate verified inside a verified algorithm).
○Automated & unreviewed
Only automated (LLM-assisted) review or an unreviewed community submission backs this record so far. Treat it as a starting point, not evidence.
LLM-assisted review
An LLM checked the record for internal consistency. Useful screening, not evidence of correctness.
Community submission
Submitted by the community and not yet through the review pipeline.
45 public entries
Atlas stars stay in this public list. Saving an entry to your workspace starts an unstarred private copy.
Find quantum circuits that diagonalize a given input Hamiltonian, that is, approximate its eigenstates, without resorting to brute-force optimization of an unstructured variational circuit, which runs into barren plateaus.
Given a target position for a robot manipulator's end effector, find joint angles that reach it — the inverse kinematics problem, which has no analytical solution for a general 6-degree-of-freedom arm and admits many joint configurations at once for a redundant one.
Predict the three-dimensional structure a protein takes from its primary sequence of amino acids, posed here on the model Hamiltonian the paper defines for a chain of N monomers placed on a tetrahedral lattice.
Determine the ground state of weakly-interacting, non-covalently bonded molecules — the weakly-bound intermolecular regime that variational quantum algorithms applied to strongly-bound, covalently-bonded systems with full molecular-orbital bases had left largely unexplored — using a coarse-grained representation of the electronic response suited to a VQA.
Simulate strongly correlated chemical systems on near-term quantum hardware, whose noise and limited size otherwise confine such simulations to small chemical systems, by embedding a quantum treatment of a strongly correlated fragment within a larger classical calculation.
variational quantum eigensolverquantum embeddingdensity functional theory