← Atlas

Operators · Quantum error correction

Shor nine-qubit error-correction code

A foundational code record that compares quantum protection with the narrower classical repetition-code idea.

Strong empiricalUpdated

View frozen graph

logical qbit-flip blockphase-flip blockStep 1 of 3 · Encode · on logical qEncodeStep 2 of 3 · Syndrome · on logical q, bit-flip blockSyndromeStep 3 of 3 · Recover · on logical q, bit-flip blockRecover

3 steps across 3 wires. Hover a step, or press play to go through them in order.

Expected outcomes

  • Logical fidelity90%
  • Steps3
  • Wires3
  • Logical1 qubit
  • Physical9 qubits
  • Corrects1-qubit Pauli error
  • Papers2

Quantum vs classical

Classical baseline

A three-bit classical repetition code can correct a bit flip under an independent noise model, but it does not protect an unknown qubit phase.

Quantum claim

Uses redundant quantum degrees of freedom and syndrome information to protect against a single-qubit Pauli error in the idealized code model.

How to compare

Compare logical error rate with and without encoding under the same calibrated noise, including all syndrome and recovery operations.

References

Strong empirical
  • Verified by construction
  • Peer-reviewed paper
Method
Bit-flip and phase-flip syndrome structure is represented as a code-level reference.
Result
Pass as a structural reference · no blanket hardware threshold claim.
Caveat
Encoding, syndrome extraction, recovery, and ancilla errors can outweigh the protection on small noisy devices.
Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory ↗
Kind
curated reference
Reviewed by
LeonaQ literature curation pass
License
Public bibliographic link; code is an original reference sketch
error correctionstabilizerfault tolerantsyndrome
  • Fault-tolerant architecture education
  • Decoder and noise-model evaluation
  • Logical-memory experiments

Atlas stars stay in the public catalog. Saving this entry to your workspace starts an unstarred private copy.