← Atlas

Algorithms · Variational quantum algorithm

Protein folding on a tetrahedral lattice by a variational quantum algorithm

Predict the three-dimensional structure a protein takes from its primary sequence of amino acids, posed here on the model Hamiltonian the paper defines for a chain of N monomers placed on a tetrahedral lattice.

Attested & literatureUpdated

Open on the mapView frozen graph

  • Record typeLiterature reference
  • Reference implementationprotein_folding_with_qaoa
  • Reported costO(N⁴) scaling for the model Hamiltonian of a polymer chain with N monomers on a tetrahedral lattice. The abstract states no running time for the variational algorithm, no query or gate count, and no speed-up factor against classical folding methods; its only concrete figures are qubit counts for two named instances, 22 qubits for the 10 amino acid Angiotensin peptide and 9 qubits for a 7 amino acid neuropeptide on an IBM Q 20-qubit quantum computer. On the classical side it states that the problem is intrinsically NP-hard even reduced to its simplest Hydrophobic-Polar model, while classical algorithms provide practical solutions by sampling the conformation space of small proteins.
  • Papers1
Record type
Literature reference
Reference implementation
protein_folding_with_qaoa
Reported cost
O(N⁴) scaling for the model Hamiltonian of a polymer chain with N monomers on a tetrahedral lattice. The abstract states no running time for the variational algorithm, no query or gate count, and no speed-up factor against classical folding methods; its only concrete figures are qubit counts for two named instances, 22 qubits for the 10 amino acid Angiotensin peptide and 9 qubits for a 7 amino acid neuropeptide on an IBM Q 20-qubit quantum computer. On the classical side it states that the problem is intrinsically NP-hard even reduced to its simplest Hydrophobic-Polar model, while classical algorithms provide practical solutions by sampling the conformation space of small proteins.
Complexity basis
abstract of arXiv:1908.02163 (TeX rendered into Unicode: the abstract's script-O written O, its exponent as a superscript, and its italic N as plain N): "we present a model Hamiltonian with O(N⁴) scaling and a corresponding quantum variational algorithm for the folding of a polymer chain with N monomers on a tetrahedral lattice". The qubit figures are from the same abstract: "to simulate the folding of the 10 amino acid Angiotensin peptide on 22 qubits", and "The same method is also successfully applied to the study of the folding of a 7 amino acid neuropeptide using 9 qubits on an IBM Q 20-qubit quantum computer". The classical statements are from "Although classical algorithms provide practical solutions, sampling the conformation space of small proteins, they cannot tackle the intrinsic NP-hard complexity of the problem, even reduced to its simplest Hydrophobic-Polar model". The abstract states no running time and no comparison of running times, so none is recorded here.
Circuit
Not supplied

References

  • Resource-Efficient Quantum Algorithm for Protein Folding

    Anton Robert, Panagiotis Kl. Barkoutsos, Stefan Woerner, Ivano Tavernelli · 2019

    Primary source: it states the O(N⁴) model Hamiltonian for a polymer chain of N monomers on a tetrahedral lattice, the corresponding quantum variational algorithm, and the optimisation scheme that combines variational quantum algorithms adapted to classical cost functions with evolutionary strategies. It also reports the two experiments quoted here, the 10 amino acid Angiotensin peptide on 22 qubits and the 7 amino acid neuropeptide on 9 qubits of an IBM Q 20-qubit machine. Consult it for the encoding of a conformation into qubits, the ansatz and optimiser settings, the platform the 22-qubit result was obtained on, and the accuracy of the reported folds, none of which the abstract states.

Attested & literature
  • Peer-reviewed paper
Method
Curation only. This record documents the algorithm a published reference implementation demonstrates, not the demonstration itself: nothing in Leona runs Qmod. The primary reference's title, authors and submission year were read from its arXiv abs page, and the complexity claim taken from a clause of that paper's abstract (abstract of arXiv:1908.02163 (TeX rendered into Unicode: the abstract's script-O written O, its exponent as a superscript, and its italic N as plain N): "we present a model Hamiltonian with O(N⁴) scaling and a corresponding quantum variational algorithm for the folding of a polymer chain with N monomers on a tetrahedral lattice". The qubit figures are from the same abstract: "to simulate the folding of the 10 amino acid Angiotensin peptide on 22 qubits", and "The same method is also successfully applied to the study of the folding of a 7 amino acid neuropeptide using 9 qubits on an IBM Q 20-qubit quantum computer". The classical statements are from "Although classical algorithms provide practical solutions, sampling the conformation space of small proteins, they cannot tackle the intrinsic NP-hard complexity of the problem, even reduced to its simplest Hydrophobic-Polar model". The abstract states no running time and no comparison of running times, so none is recorded here.). No circuit was constructed, simulated or run.
Result
Pass · the record's problem statement and primary reference agree with the sources named above.
Caveat
Nothing here was built, compiled, simulated or run, and no peptide structure was predicted: this record documents the algorithm as its paper states it and does not reproduce any implementation of it. The O(N⁴) figure is the scaling of the model Hamiltonian in the number of monomers, not a running time and not a speed-up, and the abstract does not say which quantity of the Hamiltonian grows that way — its number of terms, of qubits, or of couplings. The abstract gives no time complexity for the variational optimisation, no gate count, no circuit depth, no ansatz, no iteration count and no accuracy, and it claims no advantage over classical folding methods, so nothing here supports one. Its NP-hard remark is about the folding problem itself and about what classical algorithms cannot tackle; it does not say that this algorithm escapes that complexity, and nothing here claims it does. The 22-qubit folding of the Angiotensin peptide and the 9-qubit run on the IBM Q machine are the paper's own reported experiments, at 10 and 7 amino acids respectively, and neither was repeated or checked here; the abstract names hardware only for the 7 amino acid case, so this record does not say on what platform the 22-qubit result was obtained, and neither experiment establishes that the method reaches proteins of biological size. A lattice model Hamiltonian is a reduction of the folding problem, so solving it answers the model rather than the structure-prediction problem itself, and the claim that this model reflects many physico-chemical properties of the protein, reducing the gap between coarse-grained representations and mere lattice models, is the abstract's rather than anything checked here. The abstract calls the second application successful without stating a criterion, and it does not say how close either reported fold is to the true structure. The NISQ premise is stated in the abstract as evidence that such algorithms can accelerate energy optimization in frustrated systems, not as a proof, and no noise model, error rate or error-correction requirement is given anywhere in it.
Resource-Efficient Quantum Algorithm for Protein Folding ↗
Kind
curated reference
Reviewed by
Leona Quantum curation pass
License
Citation metadata only; source publication terms apply
protein foldingvariationallattice modelchemistrynisq

Atlas stars stay in the public catalog. Saving this entry to your workspace starts an unstarred private copy.