← Atlas

Operators · Fermionic Hamiltonians

Fermi-Hubbard dimer operator (Jordan-Wigner encoded)

The two-site Fermi-Hubbard dimer Hamiltonian, mapped to qubits via the Jordan-Wigner transformation: nearest-neighbor hopping competing with on-site Coulomb repulsion.

Exact & formalUpdated

View frozen graph

1↑1↓2↑2↓Step 1 of 4 · Hop (XX+YY) · on 1↑, 2↑Hop (XX+YY)Step 2 of 4 · Hop (XX+YY) · on 1↓, 2↓Hop (XX+YY)Step 3 of 4 · U n₁↑n₁↓ · on 1↑, 1↓U n₁↑n₁↓Step 4 of 4 · U n₂↑n₂↓ · on 2↑, 2↓U n₂↑n₂↓

4 steps across 4 wires. Hover a step, or press play to go through them in order.

Expected outcomes

  • Half-filling ground sector (N=2)100%
  • Steps4
  • Wires4
  • Sites × spins2 × 2 = 4 modes / qubits
  • Terms2 hopping (XX+YY) + 2 on-site U
  • ConservedTotal fermion number N
  • Papers2
  1. Hop (XX+YY) on 1↑, 2↑
  2. Hop (XX+YY) on 1↓, 2↓
  3. U n₁↑n₁↓ on 1↑, 1↓
  4. U n₂↑n₂↓ on 2↑, 2↓
Half-filling ground sector (N=2)100%

References

Exact & formal
  • Direct mathematics
  • Verified by construction
  • Peer-reviewed paper
Method
Total particle number N = Σ n_iσ (per-spin-orbital occupation from Jordan-Wigner) was checked to commute exactly with the assembled 4-qubit (2-site, 2-spin) SparsePauliOp Hamiltonian by explicit matrix commutator, confirming the hopping and interaction terms both conserve fermion number as required by the JW encoding.
Result
Pass · [H, N] is the zero matrix to numerical precision, confirming particle-number conservation of the encoded operator.
Strategies for solving the Fermi-Hubbard model on near-term quantum computers ↗
Kind
curated reference
Reviewed by
Leona Quantum curation pass
License
CC BY 4.0-compatible reference metadata
hubbard modelfermionic simulationjordan-wignerstrongly correlated electrons

Atlas stars stay in the public catalog. Saving this entry to your workspace starts an unstarred private copy.