About this map
Sections
What this is
Quantum algorithms are not written from scratch. They are assembled from a small number of reusable steps, and almost every published method is a different route through the same handful of them.
This is a map of those routes. Circles are the things an algorithm can be holding. Lines are the steps that carry you from one to the next. A method is a path across.
Nothing here is generated. Every line was read out of a paper and checked against it.
How to read it
- Something you can hold — a state, a matrix, a circuit, an answer.
- The same, in the middle of a step you have opened.
- A step. Someone has published a way through it.
- A step whose way through has not been pinned to one method.
- A step nothing published fills yet.
- A step you have opened. What is drawn inside it is how it was done.
- There is a record in the repository for this one.
How to move around
- Two fingers move the map. Pinch to zoom, or hold ctrl and scroll.
- Click a step to open it in place — everything else stays where it is.
- Click a name to read the full record without leaving the map.
- Arrow keys move, plus and minus zoom, zero puts it back.
What a line is claiming
A solid line means a paper puts those two steps together and we have the citation. A long-dashed line means the route is recorded but no single method has been named for that step. A short-dashed line means nothing published fills it — the step is real, the way through is not written yet.
A count after a step's name — ×T/h, ×O(κ) — means the route walks that step that many times rather than once. It is the source's own symbol, and the card says what it stands for and what one turn costs. A step with no count is a step no source we read said is repeated, which is not the same as one taken once.
A line drawn nested under another, on the soft shaded band behind it, is a narrower version of the line above it: the same construction, re-analysed or re-tuned, filling the same step. It is why two lines can draw the identical interior and still be two entries. Lines outside the band are alternatives to their neighbours, not versions of them.
The map does not hide the gaps. An empty step is drawn as an empty step.
What is not here yet
The map covers the algorithm literature. The repository covers circuits and primitives. They overlap less than you would expect, and where a method has no record we say so on its page rather than leaving the space blank.
Where something named here does have a record, its name links straight to it.
Process
Choose a time discretization or propagator approximation
Reduce continuous evolution over to a finite algebraic object — a banded linear system, a product of step propagators, or a spectral coefficient system — with a stated truncation error. When a linear system is formed, a conditioning bound is stated with it.
Open the full recordExpand it here — a map of just this
- Takes
- The generator , the interval , an error tolerance , and a target algebraic form.
- Returns
- The discrete object, its truncation-error bound, and its conditioning bound.
The choice fixes both the -scaling and the condition number the downstream solver must pay. The same ODE encoded by a finite-difference scheme and by a truncated Taylor expansion of the propagator differs exponentially in its -dependence. Treating discretization as an implementation detail hides the dominant cost term.
- Forward (explicit) Euler
First-order explicit stepping, , assembled into a banded all-at-once linear system. Liu et al. use it inside the Carleman route because its structure is simple enough to bound explicitly.
- Backward (implicit) Euler
First-order implicit stepping: each step solves . -stability is the classical reason to prefer it for stiff generators, since it removes the explicit method's step-size restriction.
- Trapezoidal rule (Crank-Nicolson)
Second-order implicit stepping that averages the generator at the two ends of each step, and is -stable. As a rational approximation of it is the diagonal Padé approximant.
- Truncated Taylor series of the propagator
Rather than approximating the derivative, approximate the propagator itself by Taylor terms and encode those terms as extra rows of a sparse linear system. Truncation error falls factorially in , so accuracy is bought by adding rows rather than by shrinking and lengthening the system.
- Truncated Dyson series of the propagator
Truncate the Dyson series — the expansion that stands in for the propagator once the generator varies with time — and encode its terms as rows of a system of linear equations. This is what extends the all-at-once approach to genuinely time-dependent generators; solving the system those rows make up is the layer below.
- Chebyshev pseudospectral collocation
A **global** discretization, and the only one on this slot. Write each component of the solution as a truncated Chebyshev series with the coefficients undetermined, then fix them by demanding that the differential equation hold exactly at the Chebyshev-Gauss-Lobatto nodes . What comes out is one linear system in the coefficients. Childs and Liu put the difference from every stepping scheme plainly: "instead of locally approximating the ODE at discretized times, these linear equations use the behavior of the differential equations at the times to capture their behavior over the entire interval ".
- Quantum simulation of the KvN representation
Because the Koopman-von Neumann generator is Hermitian and its propagator unitary, the lifted evolution can be run by Hamiltonian simulation directly. No linear system is assembled and no linear solver is called.
- LCHS — linear combination of Hamiltonian simulation
Express a general non-unitary evolution operator as a linear combination of unitary evolution operators, each of which solves a Hamiltonian simulation problem, rather than converting the problem into a dilated linear system. An, Liu and Lin state that the method can achieve optimal cost in terms of state preparation.
- LCHS with the improved kernel
A family of identities expressing non-unitary evolution as a linear combination of unitary evolutions, built on the kernel with and . The kernel decays at a near-exponential rate , replacing the original Cauchy kernel's quadratic decay and exponentially enhancing accuracy.
- Schrödingerisation (linear PDEs as Schrödinger equations)
A simple change of variable — the warped phase transformation, which introduces one extra variable — recasts any linear PDE or ODE system into a system of Schrödinger equations in real time, which ordinary Hamiltonian simulation then runs. The original solution is recovered from the auxiliary dimension.
No field holds this yet — the model is still being designed.
None found yet.
No record covers this yet. Whether that is a gap or deliberate is not something anything on this record can say.
Where the routes meet
11 problems nothing else needs — the places a reader arrives. Open a line to see what is recorded inside it, or click its name to go there.
13 lines have something recorded inside that you have not opened.
Of the routes that have been taken apart, 15 are built entirely from named slots, 15 hand off part of the work and finish the rest themselves, and 20 are one undivided act. None of the three is a defect; they are different things to reuse.
Every line on this figure, in words
The lines on this figure
Solve a nonlinear ODE dy/dt = F(y)
- Embed a nonlinear system into a linear one — opens into 6 · a way across — click it to open it here
- Solve a linear ODE du/dt = A(t)u + b(t) — opens into 9 · a way across — click it to open it here
- Choose a time discretization or propagator approximation → Quantum linear solve — open
- Choose a time discretization or propagator approximation — opens into 6 · a way across — click it to open it here
- Quantum linear solve — opens into 5 · a way across — click it to open it here
- Simulate Hamiltonian evolution → Estimate an observable — open
- Simulate Hamiltonian evolution — opens into 3 · a way across — click it to open it here
- Estimate an observable — opens into 4 · a way across — click it to open it here
Estimate an excited-state energy
- Variational quantum deflation — opens into 3 · a way across — click it to open it here
- Subspace-search variational eigensolver — opens into 3 · a way across — click it to open it here
- Quantum subspace expansion
- Quantum equation of motion
- Folded-spectrum variational eigensolver — open · opened: what was inside is drawn in its place
- Choose a parameterised trial state — opens into 13 · a way across — click it to open it here
- Minimise the energy variance
- Measure commuting terms together
- Penalty-constrained variational eigensolver — opens into 3 · a way across — click it to open it here
- Multistate contracted variational eigensolver — opens into 3 · a way across — click it to open it here
Every step you can open
1 of these have an object recorded in the middle; the rest open into the methods that fill them.
- Solve a nonlinear ODE dy/dt = F(y)
- Replace a spatial domain with a finite grid
- Discretize a PDE into one linear system
- Embed a nonlinear system into a linear one
- Solve a linear ODE du/dt = A(t)u + b(t)
- Recast a non-Hermitian generator as Hamiltonian evolution
- Choose a time discretization or propagator approximation
- Quantum linear solve
- Matrix function
- QSP phase factors
- Polynomial approximation
- Block-encode a matrix
- Prepare an input state
- Amplify a success branch
- Simulate Hamiltonian evolution
- Estimate an observable
- Compile a circuit to a specific device
- Satisfy the hardware connectivity constraint
- Approximate a continuous rotation in a discrete gate set
- Recover a noiseless expectation value by post-processing
- Build logical qubits at a target logical error rate
- Estimate a Hamiltonian's ground-state energy
- Choose a parameterised trial state
- Minimise the objective over the parameters
- Estimate an excited-state energy
- Measure what the machine can actually do
- Recover the period of a periodic function
- Estimate the eigenphase of a unitary
- Find the item a check accepts
- Walk a graph to the vertex you want
- Search a cost Hamiltonian for the assignment it minimises
What is on this map, counted
What is here, counted
147 nodes — 31 slots and 116 methods.
76 of the 147 link to a record in the Atlas, between them naming 89 records. The rest name papers and nothing else: this graph describes work the catalogue has not got yet, and the nodes with no record are the list of what a corpus pass has to go and read.
0 slots have no method recorded, and 32 methods have not been taken apart. Both are shown as what they are rather than left blank.
Every claim here rests on a source. This graph cites 140 papers; they and the 172 the Atlas cites alone are registered in one place, with what each reports and everywhere it is cited from. Papers